![]() But King Kong, you can say, is the first digital character that seems real in almost every scene of the film. Previously, I think Lord of the Rings' Gollum, also directed by Peter Jackson, was the most realistic CGI character image. Of course, both these terms are used here in the best possible sense! Another great achievement of King Kong is the awesome reality represented in its title character. What happens here is that King Kong is the master and Ann Darrow, by her own volition, assumes the role of pet. In addition, a master offers his pet special care and affection. A very special relationship between a dog and its master is very common, where a number of qualities are seen clearly, like love, affection, friendship, mutual respect, platonic love, loyalty, and being able to spend time together sharing activities. The strangest thing about this relationship is the apparent peculiar inversion of roles between Ms. The real charm of the film is its very believable emotional relationship developed between Ann Darrow (Naomi Watts) and the digital image rendering of KING KONG himself. I would say it also qualifies as the best cinematic representation of its type that has appeared in films until 2005, however, not by much, but rather, just barely. Then, when they get to "Skull Island", we are in a prehistoric world, forgotten millions of years ago. Perhaps the best recreation and atmosphere of someplace in the past, without a doubt. It is worth commenting that Jackson' recreation was nothing short of absolutely spectacular. first, leading you to the City of New York, at the beginning of the 30s. For many, King Kong will probably seem like a surreal time machine. Of course, if one so wishes to interpret it that way. It is, basically, an indictment of just how the modern world destroys everything that is good and innocent for its insatiable appetite for massive and rampant commercialization. King Kong (2005) has many things going for it and against it! Despite this, any film, and King Kong in particular, is much more than a summary and analysis of its strengths and weaknesses. This new version is perhaps one of the best cinema remakes of recent years! BUT.(and it is a very BIG "BUT"!) The simple fact that it is not an original story involves many limitations, at least, in my opinion! However, for a few minutes, I'll try to continue this review taking into account that the vast majority of you have never seen the 1933 original. The director of King Kong (2005), Peter Jackson (Trilogy: Lord of the Rings), says he saw the original version at age nine and that was what inspired him to become a film-maker. Although the film, at that time, tripled me in age, its special effects were the best I had ever seen, without a doubt. ![]() ![]() The ONLY Tony Kiss Castillo on FaceBook!- WARNING: Might Contain a Couple MINOR Spoilers! In 1956, when I was 8, I saw the original version (1933) of King Kong for the first time. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |